Saturday, October 19, 2019

The 7 Desires of Halloween: #6 Danger



“An army of nightmares, huh? Let's get this party started.”—Cabin in the Woods

“Death comes to us all,” I told the couple.  “Chop, chop.  No point delaying the inevitable.”  It was dark, and the screams of other victims could be heard echoing through the labyrinth, along with breaking glass, mad laughter, and animal squeals. 

“No, you go first,” laughed the woman, throwing her gentleman in front of her as they faced a dark corridor lined with femur bones.  He smirked, but the smirk metastasized to a rigor mortis as the sudden blast of an alarm caused him to stumble.  “I don’t want to go first.  You go first!”  They shuffled their order for a bit, alternately laughing and squealing, but eventually the gentleman led into the dark.  I turned to the next victims.


Hour after hour, night after night, this same little skit plays out in a hundred variations.  People show up to the haunted house I work at and demand to experience fear.  To be anxious.  To feel, for the space of 20 or so minutes, that danger is just around the corner.  And when you don’t deliver, they become irate.  (I remember receiving much verbal abuse at my last haunt over insufficient terror.  It had extraordinary production quality, but being outdoors, there was nothing we could do about the Manhattan skyline silhouetting every sneaking spectre, spoiling the surprise.)



At first glance, this is pure madness.  Many people (including myself, at times) see very expensive professionals who prescribe very expensive medication that they may have less anxiety in their lives. 

I have a theory as to why people seek out danger on Halloween, but first let’s make sure we have all the information.  Let’s look at two other ways people seek out danger: slasher flicks and what most people call scary stories, but I’ll call “Halloween tragedies.”

By Halloween tragedies, I mean a story where the protagonist has many opportunities to turn back, but still marches towards his or her doom.  I’m thinking of “Jerusalem’s Lot” or “The Shadow of Innsmouth” or “The Tell-Tale Heart.”  In Lovecraft’s “The Shadow over Innsmouth” for instance, the protagonist receives repeated warnings not to dig into the mysteries of the town, and ends up discovering his own doomed heritage as a result of the failure to heed these warnings.  He doesn’t die, per se, but the self he knows does end.  King’s “Jerusalem’s Lot” has similar warnings, and more direct consequences.  As for Poe’s unreliable narrators, I think we are all familiar with their foolhardy commitment to homicide despite many opportunities to repent.  In a classical tragedy, everyone of significance dies at the end except the audience.   And this relief  we feel as the audience at having “survived” is what some interpret as the source of Aristotle’s catharsis.  We feel hope and anxiety for the wayward protagonists until the very end, and then, suddenly, it’s over and we have triumphed by virtue of still existing while the protagonist we journeyed with has not.  More on this in a moment.

Note: None of these ideas are original with me except for the term "Halloween Tragedy"

Next, slasher films, for instance, Cabin in the Woods.  (I’d give a spoiler warning, but--let’s face it--if you are reading my blog you’ve either seen Cabin in the Woods or never will, so let’s continue.)
5 annoyingly pretty college students spend their summer break at a cabin that turns out to be….blah blah blah, you get the idea.  The twist is they are being watched by a shadowing pseudo-government cabal, who orchestrates their grisly ends as part of a yearly sacrifice to stop the world from ending.  Two of the teens survive, the sacrifice fails, and the world ends.

The most disturbing interpretation of this piece is the one Jody Foster’s character gives us in the movie itself: the teens are being punished for being young.  This suggests that when we watch characters in slasher films die, we are subconsciously punishing them for not sleeping with us.  Too Freudian for me; I don’t buy it.  It also doesn’t explain haunted houses, unless people are punishing themselves. (Well, there are haunted houses for that, but that’s a whole different thing which I suspect has little to do with the haunted part).

No, you will not get an image to accompany that joke.

I think that the film is a metaphor for slasher films (I hasten to add that this idea is not original to me).  The “sacrifice” (i.e. movie) must go off without a hitch or the world (i.e. the studio) will end.  The 5 teens are the sacrifices.  We, the audience, are the old gods.  Through their deaths, we feel our world will always continue, because like Halloween tragedies, we are still alive at the end.

Does this explain our desire for danger, that is our desire for haunted houses, slasher films, and scary stories?  Is it a desire to cheat death?  Partially, but that cannot fully explain it, or else we would get the same feeling from reading stories of natural disasters in the news.  There is some indefinable spiritual quality to the practice danger of Halloween.  It is more than just surviving.  It is triumph.

My thesis is this: our triumph over danger on earth foreshadows our perpetual triumph in heaven.
The thrill we get from the danger of horror is the desire to face our demons (i.e our sins) and be triumphant.  We don’t enjoy seeing other people fail, we enjoy seeing the scenario in which they fail and imagine ourselves doing differently. 

So no, I don’t think we kill the blond girl off for sleeping with a guy who wasn’t us.  I don’t think we gleefully watch the scientist open the obviously cursed box because he’s smarter than us and we enjoy watching him do something dumb. I think we watch these people die because we want to live forever.  The feeling of triumph horror gives us foreshadows our immortality.  It is a deeply muddied desire, seen through the metaphor of shadow and violence, but it is there.  When the final day comes, and the dark spirit of danger is perfected, we will call her once again by her true name: Nike!  Victory!

Calm down, my neopagan friends.  I'm being metaphorical. For now.  We'll address demons, angels, and gods in another essay.

No comments: