Sunday, December 29, 2019

Courting Quiet on a Sunday Afternoon in Early Winter (Poetry #3)

Courting Quiet on a Sunday Afternoon in Early Winter

by Joseph Salvatore Knipper




Hush, it is not now my turn to speak.

Quiet claims the crevices between the leaves

and surveys each still-solidifying dimple of soil.

Woolly-bear and witch-hazel seed, granite grains and green beetle grub

submit to Her scepter. Hush, it is not now my turn to speak,

But to bind my brain under the brown mantle,

And follow, praying, two pace behind

Hoping for a kiss to fill my lungs with hoarfrost.

Sunday, December 22, 2019

Hot Take "Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker" (*Mostly* Spoiler Free)



WARNING!  I avoid direct plot and character spoilers below, but there may be indirect spoilers by implication.


Movies are really hard, you guys.  Here I am, writing a very short blog article for a limited audience, and even I can't get all the pieces to fit as snugly as I want.  Movies must be that times several hundred million.  Thus, I came to The Rise of Skywalker with high hopes and low expectations.  And I will want to see it again before I write a more extensive review.  But let's do a quick hot take.

Nearly all my thoughts on the movie come down to this: The Rise of Skywalker is a much better Star Wars story than The Last Jedi, but a much worse piece of cinema.


Two overwrought metaphors in comparison

I left The Last Jedi feeling as if its makers didn’t really understand what Star Wars was and only part of why it was lovable.  The Last Jedi was made by iconoclasts who believed they were doing the fans a favor by smashing the idols.  And maybe they were, but it wasn't an enjoyable process.

The Rise of Skywalker took the broken bits of marble and mosaic, glued them back together, and set them again in the temple.  But the cracks are clearly visible.

Looking at it one way, J.J. Abrams took the poorly executed parts of Rian Johnson's attempted philosophy and articulated them better while restoring and respecting what the existing fans held dear.  Looking at it another way, Abrams chopped off the difficult parts of Johnson's philosophy and repackaged it for mass market.  Abrams kept importance of sacrifice (sort of), humility (sort of), and solidarity (so they characters themselves tell me), but nixed Johnson's tendency to subvert expectations.  It was a bit of a U-turn, but one with less G-force than you might expect.  I can't say it's what the world needs morally or artistically, but it what I was hoping for as a fanboy.  Deep down I know it is candy, not vegetables.  But I ate my overboiled Johnson vegetables, and it's time for some Abrams dessert.

So that's the good news, what's the bad?

 "Fixing" The Last Jedi is the best that can be said for Rise of Skywalker.  

Editing

The Rise of Skywalker's editing sucks, plain and simple.  The Last Jedi (whose lingering shots unnecessarily extended the movie by 45 minutes) at least let us live in the Star Wars universe.  The Rise of Skywalker cuts when it should linger, racing from scene to scene in a jumble of plot explication (that actually accomplishes little explication, even considering my own tremendous ability to headcanon plot-holes).  I suspect this is largely due to an attempt to incorporate Carrie Fisher (God Rest her soul) from beyond the grave.  Do I want less Carrie Fisher?  No.  Did the writers and editors do the best they could?  Probably.  I still would like what General Leia says to have some relevance to what the other characters are saying and doing.  

Dialogue

There are some Attack of the Clones-level clunkers here.  Lando and Maz Kanata's given lines are each particularly terrible.  C-3PO, ironically, is given the best jokes in the whole movie, and the four main human characters roll a nat 20 on their charisma checks as usual.  But oh, the over-explanation.  Perhaps to overcompensate for the poor editing, an audience member's brain is given bare seconds to interpret the plot before it is explained twice by a character. (One major character arc is a blessed exception.  This, for some reason, is confusing reviewers as if it is some yet-to-be revealed mystery, but the clues are all there for anyone with eyes and ears).


Plot

I didn't think this was as bad as most of the reviews are saying.  Yes, some points were not sufficiently foreshadowed in previous movies.  Yes, there were too many MacGuffins.  Yes, a surface reading undermines previous and present sacrifices; (I want to see it again before I come down firmly on this).  However, I can suspend disbelief on all these for my space-wizard fantasy.  The only really annoying thing about the plot was how telegraphed it was.  Nearly every plot point was obvious anywhere from 30 seconds to 15 minutes before it happened.

Visuals and Combat

My initial take is too much computer animation in general.  One of the major lightsaber duels felt--it pains me to say this--boring.  And the space battles return to the confusing style of the prequels, rather than the clear and exciting battles of Return of the Jedi or Rogue One. Still, it was nice as a fanboy to see everything from Rebel dreadnoughts to B-wings to Y-wings back in action.


So that's my hot take.  Don't forget to subscribe, and comment below on how much you agree or disagree.  

#starwars #risingsrapidreviews #theriseofskywalker

Thursday, December 19, 2019

Christmas Isn't When You Think It Is


Our regional vice president at work is a fantastic man. He truly cares about his employees, and genuinely wants them to succeed and be happy. But last year he demanded on December 27th that the Christmas decorations be taken down immediately; the holiday was over, and it was back to business.  Oh, how mistaken he was.

Christmas isn’t when most people think it is. What we think of as "the Holiday Season" is actually two separate seasons—Advent and Christmas—the latter of which lasts longer than our current culture would suggest. Furthermore, Advent and Christmas each contain their own unique message and beauty. (Note 1).

So let’s break down the timeline of the seasons of Christmas and Advent.


Advent: From the Latin ad venire or "arrival."  The season of preparation for Christ’s coming in 3 ways: a) historically, b) at the end of time, and c) in our individual hearts (Note 1a). As such, Advent (liturgically speaking) is not about "decking the halls" quite yet, but a season of hopeful anticipation. Before the 9th century, it was a 40-day season of fasting and penance akin to Lent starting after St. Martin’s Day (Nov 11th), but now it begins four Sundays before December 25th. The fasting is now optional in the Western church. This is not yet the season of “Joy to the World” and the like.  Songs of waiting and longing in a minor key such as “O Come, O Come Emmanuel” and “The King Shall Come” are popular in the liturgy, but also peppier songs such as “On Jordan’s Banks”. Songs about the Virgin Mary are also popular.
  • The First two weeks of Advent, the readings in church focus on the coming of God at the end of time.
  • The Third and Fourth weeks of Advent, the readings focus on Christ’s historical coming.
    • Gaudete Sunday is the name of the Third Sunday of Advent, and it is one of only two days in the church year when Rose is used as the liturgical color. This is to symbolize joy at being more than halfway through Advent (and also to provide a break in what was historically some very intense fasting.)
  • Below is a non-comprehensive list of feasts (Note 2) that fall during the four weeks of Advent.  You'll notice that most of them were brought to the United States by a particular immigrant group, as each enriched the season of Advent in the United States.
    • December 6th(Note 3)--St. Nicholas Day: While no longer a very important feast in the United States (Note 4), this 4th century Turkish bishop used to be one of the most popular Saints among early Dutch immigrants to the United States (akin to Saint Anthony of Padua or St. Francis Assisi to Italian-Americans). Traditions surrounding his feast day—such as placing presents in stockings or shoes—moved to Christmas over time.
    • December 8th--The Solemnity of the Immaculate Conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary: Despite a popular misconception (Note 5), this is *not* the feast celebrating the conception of Jesus, but the conception of Mary by Sts. Anne and Joachim. The theology behind this dogma deserves a blog article of its own.  Mary under the title of Immaculate Conception is the patron saint of the United States.
    • December 12th--Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe: I know the story (honestly more from the episode of Wishbone as much as my Catholic education), but my family never celebrated this one, so I can’t shed a light on a lot of the traditions surrounding it.  It is especially loved by Mexican Americans.
    • December 13th--St. Lucia Day: My eldest sister always made the family St. Lucia rolls on this day, as is the tradition in Sweden and Norway, (though no, we aren't Swedish).  St. Lucia was an early Roman martyr, devotion to whom is very popular in Nordic countries.
    • December 24th--Christmas Eve: This is difficult day to categorize, because it is Advent before 4 pm, and Christmas after 4 pm; (cannon lawyers, please check my math on this). Italians still eat fish on this day, which dates from a time when Christians used to fast from meat on certain vigils (Note 2)
    Christmas:  Literally "Christ Mass". A season celebration of Christ’s historical coming and his coming into our lives and hearts. The liturgical season of Christmas is broken down into the twelve days of Christmas and the Epiphany.
    • The Twelve Days of Christmas: December 25th-January 5th.  Further broken down into the Octave of Christmas and well, those other days of Christmas.  Musically, this is the proper place for "Joy to the World," "O Little Town of Bethlehem" etc.
      • The Octave of Christmas: December 25th-January 1st.  The Christmas Octave is very different than the Easter Octave. For more on Octaves, see this blog.
        • December 25th--Christmas Day, i.e. The Nativity of the Lord
        • December 26th--St. Stephen’s Day: The feast day of the first martyr and first deacon in the church
        • December 27th--The Feast of Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist
        • December 28th--The Feast of the Holy Innocents
        • The Feast of the Holy Family (usually occurs on the first Sunday after Christmas)
        • January 1st--The Solemnity of Mary, Mother of God
      • January 5th--Twelfth Night, of the Elizabethan drama fame. The final day of the first half the the Christmas season before moving on to the Epiphany. Some years in the United States, there is no Twelfth Night, as the Epiphany is observed on the nearest Sunday.
    • The Epiphany: The Epiphany celebrates the revelation of God's incarnation to the world.  Though theologically important, this season is not as elaborately celebrated in the Western church as it is in the East (Note 6) (where is goes by the much more metal-sounding name "The Theophany"). Musically, the songs of this season include “We Three Kings of Orient Are” and “They Followed a Bright Star”
      • January 6th--The Solemnity of Epiphany, also known as Three Kings Day: This celebrates that Christ's salvation is offered to whole world, not just to one people, race or nation. Historically, it celebrates the revelation of Christ to the gentiles as symbolized by the visit of the Magi (Note 7).  In the Southern Hemisphere of the world, this, not Christmas, is the day for gift giving, though for all I know this might be changing due to American influence.
      • The Feast of the Baptism of Christ: This celebrates Christ’s Baptism in the Jordan by John the Baptist, and the start of his public ministry. It is celebrated the first Sunday after the Epiphany.  

    So you see, Christmas doesn’t start after Thanksgiving. It doesn't end on the 25th or on New Year's.  When we start our feasting on Thanksgiving and end it on New Year's, we are missing out on much of the richness the season has to offer, from the quiet anticipation of Advent to the gift-giving of the magi.

    One final complication: The Feast of Jesus' Presentation in the Temple is on February 2nd, also known as Candlemas. This is 40 days after Christmas day, and many of today and yesteryear still consider Candlemas the official end of the Christmas season.  Heck, up until 2009 the Vatican kept its Christmas tree until February 2nd.  One could thus argue (dubiously) that Christmas actually continues almost to the start of Lent.

    So tell the facilities people in your office to leave those decorations up. Water that tree again. The banquet has yet to begin.

    ___________________________________________________________________________

    Footnotes:
    1) Despite being born and bred Catholic, I didn’t know any of this until college. I owe my initial retraining in this matter to the stellar teaching of Fr. Bede Cameron of Saint Anselm Abbey.
    1a) Citation needed for this third one. I thought I read this somewhere but couldn't find it again.  One would hope Christ is already in our lives, so this may not be strictly accurate.  On the other hand, our relationship can always deepen.  Regardless of whether the focus is on Christ’s historical or future arrival, we also long for Christ to dwell in our hearts and lives. Christians are a people of Advent, for our entire focus is on bringing about the Kingdom of God in all times and places, within and without. 
    2) The Catholic Church uses several names for holidays depending on how important they are.  Solemnities are the most important, followed by feasts, memorials, and optional memorials.  Vigils are the evening before a Solemnity.
    3) In this article, I am referring primarily to the dates and traditions in the Western church.  The Eastern churches calendar and traditions have several variations (though less for the Eastern Catholic Church than for the Eastern Orthodox Churches still on the old calendar)
    4) No, SantaCon does *not* count
    5) I sincerely and seriously do not intend a pun here.
    6) Citation needed.  I'm too busy to do even my normal level of minimal research for this article, so some of this is coming from a vague memory of things I've heard.
    7)  Not kings, that is a mistranslation.  Also, the bible never specifically says there are three of them.  There are three gifts (Note 8), but no number is given to the magi.
    8) There is a theological significance in each of the magi’s gifts to Jesus. Gold was used to crown a king. Frankincense, an incense used in religious worship, acknowledges Christ's divine nature. And myrrh, used for funerals, foreshadowed his sacrifice.
    PS: I am deeply indebted to the USCCB Liturgical calendar for correcting my memory on several points.

    Wednesday, November 27, 2019

    Rising's Rapid Reviews: The Last Jedi



    The bones of The Last Jedi have been picked clean by other reviews, but there are one or two interesting scraps I’d like to hold to the light.

    At first, reviews of the film tended to be divided between “It fixed Star Wars” and “It broke Star Wars.” After going to separate corners to breathe, most reviewers settled on "It's a mixed bag."

    A mixed bag is not the same as saying it is a mediocre movie. A mediocre movie never really obtains a high or a low. The Last Jedi obtains both. It is not a good movie, but it has the best lightsaber fight of any Star Wars movie.  It is not a bad movie, but it doesn’t know how to use half its characters. This is not mediocrity. This is inconsistency.

    I suppose that the current political climate requires me to state my position on the nontraditional casting, although it oughtn’t. Let me be clear that I am firmly in the not-all-our-movie-heroes-need-to-be-white-men camp. (However, as an egg-shaped white man who will never be cast as a heroic protagonist, it costs me nothing to say this. My opinion on the funny, fat sidekick not needing to be a white man are identical, however.)


    Now that that’s out of the way, let’s talk about what I consider the single best moment and the single worst moment of the movie. (Unfortunately, Netflix prevents you from screenshots, so I literally had to take pictures of my screen with my cell phone. I apologize.  Also, all images in this article are property of Lucasfilm, obviously.)

    The Best Moment

    The best part of The Last Jedi was this detonation remote from the bombing run scene:


    Why? Because it’s filthy. There’s dirt and grease on it, but old dirt and grease. It's been stained by them over time. This detonator has a *history*. And because it has a history, the entire fictional galaxy has a history too.

    Star Wars, before the prequels, was a universe you could live in. It was dirty and detailed. Not gritty, just worn out. Old. The prequels skimped on practical effects, and the universe lost its main charm. Say what you will about the new trilogy, but it brought this weightiness back to the galaxy.



    The Worst Moment

    The worst moment in The Last Jedi is this shoulder brush when Luke confronts Kylo:


    Yes, it was funny. Yes, I know Luke was trying to distract the First Order while the rebels escaped. It doesn’t matter. Luke is finally facing his own mistakes (i.e. confronting a blood relative he tried to MURDER), yet the tone given to this moment of SALVATION is an extremely modern, dismissive, and berating gag.

    I take no issue with Luke being a man who in a moment of pride/fear does horrible things. I have no issue with him being a crazy hermit on an island or neglecting his duty to the galaxy. All of these are motivated character choices. What isn’t motivated is physical sarcasm during an offering of grace to two souls.



    These two moments encapsulate the spirit of the new trilogy.  The original trilogy’s character’s had gravitas on their moral journey; even when the moment called for comedy, they had as much weight as the aforementioned scenery. They were heroes in a universe where you could smell the greasepaint.  The prequel trilogy scrubbed away the greasepaint, but not the heroes.  This new trilogy gets the scenery right, but the heroes keep tripping and falling out of the mythic realm into our own.  This may be true to real life.  It may even be a better moral lesson for our time.  But it is bad myth-making.

    Saturday, November 16, 2019

    Rising's Rapid Reviews: American Carnage by Tim Alberta


    Read. This. Book.

    Whether you are an old-school Republican lamenting the state of the party, a Democrat wondering what the hell happened in 2016, or just a curious independent, this book is for you.

    Riveting is the best word for Tim Alberta’s blow by blow (sometimes day by day) description of the federal Republican party from 2008 to 2018, and its steady march from Reaganism to Nationalism. Tim Alberta’s great advantage is that, as a capitol hill-based journalist for over a decade, he has built strong relationships with Republican politicians, aids, and special-interest groups which give him an inside view. Mr. Alberta is an eminently fair journalist (a title many journalists claim but few as truthfully). He paints (what appears to be with my limited knowledge of politics) the full and complete picture, from the moral cowardice to demagoguery to well-intentioned flubs to self-sacrificing heroism, often all in the same person.

    This is not to say that Alberta is an objective journalist, merely that he is fair. Even he would agree he is telling a narrative.  Hardcore progressives will be frustrated by Mr. Alberta’s clear respect and affection for many of their bugbears (such as Ted Cruz, Paul Ryan, and John Boehner). However, they may be mollified by how often he also “kicks them in the teeth” when he feels it is warranted.  Hardcore Trump supporters are unlikely to enjoy Mr. Alberta’s narrative either, as he makes no bones about believing Trump to be a dishonest, xenophobic boar (my words, not his). However, they might be mollified by how often he presents Trump not as a supervillain, but merely as a flawed human being with a certain (read: caustic) perspective of the world. Although he cannot (and does not attempt to) disguise his dislike where the Republican party is going, he is as fair as it is possible to be.

    The book has plenty of levity despite its heavy subject matter. My favorite anecdote is an amusing text exchange between close friends Mike Pence and Senator Jeff Flake during the former’s campaigning for Trump in Arizona. Pence reminded Flake that he would be in the latter’s neighborhood.
    "Can you help me trim some hedges?" Flake asked. Pence replied: "As long as we can carve in 'Trump-Pence' in the hedge." Flake [...]texted him back: "Small hedge. Only have room for 'Pence.'" (Tim Alberta, Politico)
    The book is not all about Trump. In fact, the first half barely mentions him. Other interesting anecdotes include Boehner being (accidentally) pranked by the Pope, Paul Ryan hiding in the woods to avoid the speakership, and the lack of press coverage for of a bipartisan prison-sentencing reform bill.

    If there is a conclusion to this book, it is that people tend to adopt philosophies that justify their self-interest. Operating against this impulse seems to be Mr. Alberta’s standard for heroism, and it is refreshing when his subjects do.  My main criticism is the book has many typos, but that is likely a byproduct writing 688 pages in 3 months. Overall, I found American Carnage informative and enjoyable. I recommend it for anyone from center-left to center-right, and I think even those further to the extremes can find something edifying in it.

    Series Introduction: Rising's Rapid Reviews


    I have a lot to say, but not a lot of time. In Rising’s Rapid Reviews, I (“Epimetheus Rising”) briefly review all or part of a text (text being an all-encompassing word for movies, books, plays, podcasts, etc). This is not meant to be a thorough beat-by-beat (that’s what podcasts are for, silly) nor an academic article exploring a particular thesis, merely a way to share some thoughts I had about a text that I think are at least a little original or amusing. It may be that I see something I haven’t heard anyone else mention, or I may be boosting the signal of ideas I have heard elsewhere. Either way, I hope these quick reflections provoke both thought and amusement.

    PS: Unlike my last series, this will not be done all at once with a specific end date, but sporadically, whenever the Spirit (at least, I hope it is motivated by The Spirit) moves me.

    Saturday, November 2, 2019

    The 7 Desires of Halloween: #1 Death

    (I expect this topic to be very life affirming, but just in case, if you are experiencing suicidal impulses, please call the national suicide prevention lifeline at 1-800-273-8255)

    The goal of life is to die, one day at a time.

    The purpose of life is to live forever.

    I’ll break this down in a second. First, let’s talk about the undead.

    We’re attracted to the undead. Whether it is an immortal singing skeleton king in an unchanging town, or a stylish vampire living in a remote castle, we love them, and often want to join them. I think there are two reasons for this, one healthy and one it's unhealthy muddling.

    The unhealthy reason is that they do what they please. They have power and no obligations. On top of this they are often also wealthy (1% compound interest isn’t that bad when you have centuries) and/or attractive. They are at license to do anything, from indulge their darker sexual impulses to stay up way past their bedtimes.

    Jack Skellington takes as many Milky Way fun size bars as he damn well pleases, thank you very much
    (painting by Thomas Volpe)

    The healthy reason is that they are fully themselves. They are eternal, like we will be in heaven. They have their niche in their little kingdom of night, like we will one day have our unique place in the Kingdom of Heaven. Their power extends from a natural reflection of their innate nature, like our own power extends from our honed gifts and talents. In some ways, they are more fully human than we are. 

    Not to mention badass.  PS: I hate this show's portrayal of the Catholic Church, but I can't pretend it doesn't make us look cool.

    There is a Christian devotion called “Memento Mori” or “Remember Death.” It means keeping a reminder of death nearby, such as a literal human skull.  It has seen a comeback in recent years (this time with plastic skulls) thanks to the work of Sr. Theresa Aletheia Noble. (Like many of the ideas discussed in this blog, I am extrapolating from a tangential familiarity without doing extensive research. I have not read Sister’s books yet, and if I get something wrong please feel free to correct in the comments below). Remembering death, though, has more than one meaning.

    1) The most obvious meaning, of course, is that our bodies will die one day. No person of reason (other than some very persistent rich people in Silicon Valley) disputes this point. Whether we are kleptocrat or clinician, president or priest, beggar or busboy, a cascade of various organ failures will one day put us in the ground. We all have that in common. We do well then not to take ourselves too seriously. The end in this realm of existence is always the same.

    2) For a Christian though, this has an added meaning. While we must not take ourselves too seriously, we must take what we *do* more seriously in light of death. One day, we will stand before God, and must give an account of what we have done with the gifts given to us. What fruit have they born? And the fruit we tend to care about won’t necessarily be the fruit God cares about; (see Leaf by Niggle).

    3) The meaning of Memento Mori which I most need (right now) is to remember that we have died to sin.  Every burden, every single piece of misery in our life which is self-caused (whether we are willing to admit it or not), we have the power to put down through the death of God. It doesn’t matter whether I am a fighting the temptation to murder (usually not) or I just would like to stop clicking “next episode” on Netflix (quite frequent). God gives us the power to put it down.

    Note I do not say God gives us the power to fight those things which keep us enslaved. We will ALWAYS lose the battle against them. Sin is stronger than us. Rather the power of Christ’s death and resurrection is that we can give our lives to him, and then He can break our chains (thus giving us our lives back). Trying to break the chains ourselves, and only then turning to Christ, will end in failure. This is what we always try to do (this is what I always try to do) and we have it backwards. Part of this is a desire not to face Christ until we are perfect, and part of it is a desire to keep our lives essentially for ourselves. Neither can be done. This is what Christ means when he says “For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it” (Matthew 16:25). If we try to structure God around our life, we will die. If we structure our life around God, we will live. 

    The Servant by Ron DiCianni

    This is why every 12 step program in existence never mentions the thing that a member of that program is struggling with after the 1st step. Their battle is not with alcohol/media/drugs/lust/debt etc. God does battle with those things for them. This does not mean they are passively waiting for God to fix them. Instead they take on another battle: the battle to put their life in God’s hands.  That is, they strive to die, one day at a time.

    4) The purpose of life is to live forever with God. This is made possible by another “Memento Mori.” We remember Christ’s death, the source of our hope. We have hope in eternal life because we have faith in Christ’s death and resurrection. Christ overcame death, and so shall we who bind ourselves to him. “For you have died, and your life is hidden with Christ in God” (Colossians 3:3)

    A corollary of the above was only brought to my attention recently, by Bishop Robert Barron’s Word on Fire podcast: remember you have died already. As Christians, if we have died with Christ, death should not frighten us.  After all, we’ve had daily practice in it. 

     Perhaps this is the freedom, though distorted, that we see and love in the undead of Halloween. They’ve already faced the thing we fear most and come out of it better. Perhaps not better as a Christian understands it, but metaphorically more themselves. May the same be said of us.

    A very happy allhallowtide to you all.  Thank you for reading!

    Friday, November 1, 2019

    The 7 Desires of Halloween #2: Spirituality


    Human beings desire to communicate with minds that are other than their own.  As
    Lewis' extraterrestrial encountering narrator implies below, why else would we own pets?

    “[…]the Malacandrians don’t keep pets and, in general, don’t feel about their ‘lower animals’ as we do about ours[…]One just sees why when one sees the three species together. Each of them is to the others both what a man is to us and what an animal is to us. They can talk to each other, they can co-operate, they have the same ethics; to that extent a sorn and a hross meet like two men. But then each finds the other different, funny, attractive as an animal is attractive. Some instinct starved in us, which we try to soothe by treating irrational creatures almost as if they were rational, is really satisfied in Malacandra. They don’t need pets.”--Out of the Silent Planet by C.S. Lewis

    Much of our fiction uncovers a desire to discover extraterrestrial minds. In the context of horror, this usually turns out poorly for us. 




    However, some of our most popular aliens are friendly ones. Look at how beloved ET is, despite not being able to converse fluently.  Human being want to discover another order of being that we can talk to as equals, and our fiction is full of it, whether we call them aliens, elves, or ghosts.

    We don't have aliens yet, but if you assume nearly any theology at all, we do have alien minds in the spiritual realm.  But here’s where the danger comes in (and I would say the main danger of Halloween in modern society other than lust).  Spirits only come in two types (as far as we know): good (The Holy Spirit, angels) and evil (demons). 

    What about gods and fairies, you ask? Well, here I must descend into opinion. *Some* people believe that other types of spirits exist between angels and men. Because they exist in the world and not in eternity like angels, they are neither entirely good or entirely evil. They run the moral gamut like us, just differently. C.S. Lewis notably included the Greek gods as servants of GOD in much of his fiction. In Out of the Silent Planet the basis for earth's legends of  the Roman god Mars literally rules the planet Mars. In Prince Caspian, Bacchus celebrates Aslan's victory by crazy-dancing with some dryads. 


    I find a view of reality which includes the pagan gods under God incredibly appealing. However, I also find it a) unlikely and b) dangerous.

    A) I find it unlikely because any spirit that exists outside of eternity must exist in the cosmos.  And anything that exists in the cosmos we will eventually find empirical evidence for.  No matter how many science experiments I do, I will never publish a scientific paper on angels.  They exist outside of space and time, and thus even if I went to Mars, I wouldn’t find them.  Polytheistic gods (and those lesser sprites, fairies etc) are apparently here in the world. They wield lightning, or water, or metal, or wine. I can go to the top of Mt. Olympus and demonstrate that they are there, or not. Thus, I think if there is someone in between angels and men, we would have found them by now. (I am aware that I am not following current neopagan belief. While that is not my specialty, I have a vague notion that the current neopagan concept of “the Lord & the Lady” is somewhat more transcendent than the gods of old. But as I warned in my first article, I am taking this from a Catholic perspective).

    B) I find it dangerous, because when you call upon spirits that are not allied with God, anything could answer. If the gods don’t exist, that means that "anything" must be demons. St. Paul clearly comes down on this side when he says "So what am I saying? That meat sacrificed to idols is anything? Or that an idol is anything? No, I mean that what they sacrifice, [they sacrifice] to demons not to God, and I do not want you to become participants with demons." (1 Corinthians 10:19-20)  Many Catholic exorcists have spoken on how they believe the rise in possessions they see currently is the result of the rise of occult practices. I even read an interview of a non-exorcist priest (not every priest is authorized or trained to perform exorcisms) who had to instruct a pair of Baptist women how to get a demon out of their lives after they used a Ouija board. (To Save a Thousand Souls by Fr. Frett A. Brannen pgs 19-20).


    “There are two equal and opposite errors into which our race can fall about the devils. One is to disbelieve in their existence. The other is to believe, and to feel an excessive and unhealthy interest in them.”  --The Screwtape Letters by C.S. Lewis (Image Credit)


    While I’ve never used a Ouija board, I do cross into gray territory sometimes. I’m not always sure where to draw the lines.

    Where does one draw the lines? A solid place to start is to avoid things that are forbidden by the church: astrology, astral projection, magic (even white magic), worshipping idols etc.  But these things aren’t temptations for me. Ghosts stories are.

    I love Halloween, so it’s no surprise I love ghost stories. But ghosts are bound up in séance culture, which seems to me like a pretty clear violation. (The giggling sounds you hear is all my protestant readers wondering what the difference is between a séance and praying to the Saints. The different is that 1) I know exactly who I am talking to 2) I know they are allied with God, and 3) I am asking them for help to become more holy, not for magic tricks). However, ghost stories around the campfire seems pretty safe. What about Ghost hunting equipment such as heat cameras….now we’re into fuzzy territory. I don’t have an answer, but I do think of C.S. Lewis “materialist magicians” when I see modern-style ghost hunters. I recently read this excellent blog article where a Catholic mother laments that none of her children are believers, and she wonders if she spends too much time on ghost stories, and not enough on the Saints.

    I’m not trying to purify Halloween of any fun. Our desire for the spiritual aspect of life is good.  Outside of those things forbidden by the church, I think these are lines everyone has to discern for themselves. But it is good to remember that God, in His wisdom, has provided abundant minds who are perfectly safe to seek out, even if most of them are human (as fully human as it is possible to be). Remember that All Hallows Eve leads to All Hallows Day. The Blessed Virgin, St. Joseph, St. Justin, St. Francis, St. Cecilia and all the holy men and women are there willing to lend an ear (and to talk if, I could only learn how to listen). There are inhuman minds too: my guardian angel, other people’s guardian angels, and St. Michael wage their war, ever vigilant. We’re hardly alone.

    Happy All Saints Day, everyone!  May one day we all be saints too!

    Thursday, October 31, 2019

    The 7 Desires of Halloween: #3 Mystery




    “It was the secrets of heaven and earth that I desired to learn; and whether it was the outward substance of things or the inner spirit of nature and the mysterious soul of man that occupied me, still my inquiries were directed to the metaphysical, or in its highest sense, the physical secrets of the world. (Mary Shelley, Frankenstein)

    Mysteries can be divided into two categories: natural and supernatural. 

    Natural mysteries are that which can be known and understood materially: they follow the rules we understand the universe to operate by.  Just because they are comprehensible though, does not mean we understand them yet.  And this can lend them an air of the supernatural.

    For instance, in Shelly’s Frankenstein, the means by which the monster is created follows natural laws.  Victor Frankenstein does not delve into books of the occult to provide the monster with an animating spirit, he studies anatomy and biology.  However, his refusal to provide us with the specifics due to fear of someone else repeating his experiment is a stroke of narrative genius.  It turns Frankenstein from a classical tragedy into a Halloween tragedy.  The secret of life remains a mystery.  And that is its appeal.  When it comes to storytelling, it is often more appealing not to know. 

    As someone who believes God is a God of Truth, this bothers me somewhat. Shouldn’t knowledge always be preferable to not knowing.  Don’t human beings hunger for knowledge?  How can we also then hunger for mystery?

    I think the seeming discrepancy here lies in the difference between knowledge and truth.  All knowledge must be true by definition.  It is possible to believe something that is false, but it is impossible to *know* something that is false.

    (I tried really hard to find a citation for this epistemological assertion; I’m pretty sure its Augustine, but I couldn't find the quote I was looking for.  The citation for this image though is https://xkcd.com/285/ )

    However, it is possible for something to be true without us knowing it.  After all, we are not God.  Even if every natural law were understood in its entirety by every human being, there would still be things we did not know.  Our brains are limited. 


    This brings us to supernatural mysteries.  They cannot be understood via natural laws.  The church uses mystery in a theological context for everything from the life of Christ to the nature of the Trinity.  Despite what it may sound like, this is not a theological cop-out.  An infinite God outside of space and time, not a being but BE-ING himself, must necessarily be uncontainable by the human mind.  (My theology might be a little off here, but you get the idea).

    As the song Amazing Grace states that “when we’ve been there 10,000 years / bright shining as the sun / we’ve no less days, to sing God’s praise / then when we first begun.”  Similarly, if we are spending eternity with an infinite God, after 10,000 years (insomuch as time has any meaning in eternity) we will have no fewer things to learn about God too.

    Thus we can resolve our desire for knowledge with our desire for mystery without sacrificing our desire for truth.  Both reflect the same desire: the desire for infinity.  We can learn and yet still desire for there to be more to learn.  To quote Brandon Sanderson, “There’s always another secret.”  And thank God for that.


    PS: The finite (if far from fully understood cosmos) is not enough to fill the infinite human drive for knowledge that can only be fulfilled by an infinite God.  If someone finds belief in God impossible, even hostile deities might be preferable to the closed system of a finite cosmos.

     I think this is one of the things that makes Lovecraft so appealing to modern geeks.  Anyone else as controversial as Lovecraft would long since have been purged from the conversation of urban progressives.  But Lovecraft still has a huge following despite himself.  Why?  Because he (and like-minded writers) infused pulp sci-fi with supernatural mysteries.  The Great Old Ones are incomprehensible to the human mind.  Just seeing the tiniest glimpse or reading about their true nature in a book drives Lovecraft’s narrators a little mad. 

    However,
     unlike a Christian worldview, there is no God to keep them in check. In Lovecraft, the true nature of reality is entirely indifferent to man, but also incomprehensible.  This makes 
    Lovecraft’s narrators are the “materialist magicians” predicted by C.S. Lewis in The Screwtape LettersAnd that brings us to our next essay.

    Wednesday, October 30, 2019

    An Allhallowtide Blessing


    An Allhallowtide Blessing

    by Joseph Salvatore Knipper

    (Originally Published in Catholic Artist Connection)


    May your will be one with the LORD's,
    That the forces of Hell flee from you;
    May your prayers be tied with the Saints',
    That the Holy Dead intercede for you;
    May those who have fallen asleep
    Receive their succor in prayer from you,
    That death may lose its sting,
    The night forfeit all fear for you.





    A Holy and Fun Allhallowtide to all of you.  Thank you for reading.

    --Epimetheus

    The 7 Desires of Halloween: #4 Chaos






    “Mischief Managed”—Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

    I am largely conservative by temperament.

    While my politics run along the whole spectrum, my emotional reaction is usually: if it's not broke, don’t fix it. If it is broke, wait to make sure it’s really broken, and then try to live with it anyway because it’s probably not as broken as you think.

    So, I don’t want to blow it all up. But let’s pretend I did. Let’s talk about mischief. Let’s talk about chaos.

    I believe that the attraction of chaos is largely a desire for justice. Chaos is generally desired by those with less power and perpetrated against those with more. When it is violent, we call it terrorism. When it is perpetrated for a specific end but largely peaceful, we call it a protest or sit-in. When it is done for humor, we call it a prank. And when it is done as a celebration of youthful rebellion, we call it mischief.

    The day before Halloween is called “Mischief Night” in some areas (also common: Devil’s Night”) As Wikipedia put it, some places have separated the “tricks” from the “treats” of Halloween.” What is the appeal of TPing your neighbor’s house or egging their car? Not much, which is why I think it is mostly done by teenagers. Teenagers, being largely powerless (expect in physical capacity) find oppression everywhere they look, and not only the imaginary oppression of loving but strict parents. They are old enough to see injustice in the world, yet not old enough to be overwhelmed by it. This is why many social justice movements start with the young. They have the energy and the (at least seemingly) fresh perspective necessary to engage injustice with gusto. What the young lack is power. They want to correct a wrong *now*--as they well should--but they are not established enough within the world’s structures of power in order to do so. When you combine a seemingly fresh injustice with the seeming hopelessness of working within the system, you get a desire to burn it down. You get revolution. When you don’t even have that power, you lash out at whoever is near who has more power. Thus, November 1st suburbanites find themselves heading to the car wash.

    I believe this desire for justice through chaos is one of the appeals of zombie apocalypses. Though in theory a hellscape of gun-toting libertarian survivors against a faceless foe would seem to be more of a right-leaning fantasy, zombie apocalypses are popular with everyone. Corrupt society has been wiped away. The enemy is clearly visible and can be eliminated by straightforward and violently effective means. It’s a reflection of the desire to start "fresh".


    I believe revolutionary desires can be helpful for maintaining the health of a society. There are certain things so wrong that to not radically (though peacefully) combat would be a wrong in itself.

    However, the important thing to remember is the revolutions are chemotherapy, not vitamins. They are a radical attempt to save a society that is about to lose it soul, not a daily corrective measure. Chaos becomes unhealthy if it is violent or perpetual. The ultimate goal of revolution is to fix society and restore it, not to scrap it. The chaos of a perpetual revolution cannot create a better life for humanity any more than stagnation can. As a mentor of mine once said to me “Winners don’t get rid of everything and start from square one every time they make a mistake. They use what they have to get more.” He was speaking about jobs and income, but the same thing I think applies to society. Fortunately, as youths become adults, most of them learn they can do more within a system than without.

    However, some people become bitter at justice's perceived slow pace and resort to nihilism. This is reflected in horror fiction by the Lovecraftian-style apocalypse: alien gods come and eat all our souls. Everyone is eternally undead in permanent torment. But this nihilistic deus ex machina merely shows our desire for Christ’s Parousia.

    When Christ comes at the end of time, he will correct all the injustices of the world, (and some of us who considered ourselves just will have things flipped on our head. As CS Lewis says in classic British understatement: “There will be surprises.”) This is not to say we should tell the oppressed to just wait until heaven; we are all called to live justly here and now. But starting history anew is reserved to God alone.

    I think this cry for Christ’s justice also explains the very strange associate of Guy Fawkes (a terrorist theocrat) with anarchy (a philosophical system that believes in abolishing governments, historically using terrorist tactics). Alan Moore may not have intended it, but both the violent anarchist and the violent theocrat want society to change for the better. Unfortunately, they are willing to make it worse in order to do so.

    The chaos of Halloween, whether the nihilism of an apocalypse or the minor pranks of trick-or-treaters reflects, ultimately, a desire for God’s justice. The desire for justice cries up from every human heart. If I may be permitted to be biblical for a minute “The prayer of the lowly pierces the clouds[...]God will indeed not delay” (Sirach 35: 21a, 22a). When people fell God is seeming to delay, they often take matters into their own hands, and sometime use immoral means. Compared to some forms chaos, maybe some toilet paper on the roof is a small price to pay.



    PS: On final aspect of Chaos that I almost made its own essay is chaotic appearances. From The Addams Family to Hellboy to Frankenstein, story after story affirms the humanity of those who look different than us. Writing this on the subway often in the same car as crippled homeless people, missing teeth or covered in skin diseases, I can’t but think how much the world needs this lesson. The world is full of strange beauty. As Gerard Manley Hopkins says Christ plays in ten thousand places, / Lovely in limbs, and lovely in eyes not his /To the Father through the features of men's faces."

    Tuesday, October 29, 2019

    The 7 Desires of Halloween: #5 Eros

    "When we're together darling, every night is Halloween" --Gomez to Morticia Addams
    By my current approximation, the audience for my blog so far is 50% progressive acting friends and 50% my mother. Alright, this should be super awkward; let's talk about God and sex.

    I did not want to write this article for several reasons. First, human sexuality is such an emotionally and politically charged topic, I have no idea how to keep the focus on that which is relevant to Halloween. In order to show maximum love and respect for my brothers and sisters who disagree with me on the Theology of the Body without being misconstrued (either as a cafeteria Catholic or a puritan), it might be wise to backtrack so far that I would never get to the parts that relate to Halloween. Secondly, unlike most of the other desires, I'm not certain that I have anything to say on the topic that is wasn't said better by St. John Paul II.  Thirdly, I think the best way to discuss theology with love is to talk about personal experience, and I have no interest in doing so for this particular topic. Fourthly, I usually write these articles on my work laptop because it is small and portable.


    As you can see, our filters were flagged when you used the word "sex" 27 times.

    So I beg of you to be forgiving of this articles many flaws. I will do my best in the time I have. If you know me personally and this article upsets you, feel free to talk to me about it over a cider.

    Okay, let's focus on 3 things: modesty, dualism, and candy.

    Modesty: Anyone who thinks Eros isn't relevant to Halloween (for adults at least), hasn't been paying attention. From sexy vampires to sexy, well, everything else, the point of Halloween for a certain subset of the population seems to be to show as much skin as possible. Now, before I am accused of “*^&% shaming” (gosh, I find that term crude), let me say that it is extremely unjust that only women are called out for what they wear by society. If we are going to call for greater modesty, it cannot be based on gender at all. I also do not believe that it is my business what people who are not under my care wear at all (outside the realm of indecent exposure laws). And since I am not a father and my goddaughter is 2 years old, there is really no one on the face of planet earth whose dress habits are any of my business. If someone upsets me by what he or she wears, the only thing relevant is what in me caused me to be upset by it.

    That being said, I do believe that each of us has a call to dress modestly. What does modesty mean in a theological sense? Within the norms of our society, we are called to avoid dressing in such a way as to deliberately incite a non-spouse to lust. This means that what is immodest in Romania might not be immodest in Mexico. It is our motivation while taking into account cultural norms that determines modesty. Not some universal principle like “ankles are okay but knees are not.”


    Dualism: When it comes to Catholic teaching on human sexuality, most people (in my experience) get about 80% of the “what” right and about 80% of the “why” wrong. I believe this is due to the constant tendency towards Manicheism that infects all branches of American Christianity. Manicheism (whether it's called that or puritanism or a dozen other names) is a dualistic heresy which believes that the body is evil and the spirit is good. In its extreme, even legitimate pleasures are suspicious and must be eschewed. When Manicheism seeps into Christianity, people are told from the pulpit they must either starve the desires of the body or be damned. For most of American Christianity, people were content to either starve or laugh at the preachers and pursue their own interests covertly. Around the 1960s, however, they got tired of the convert part, and left the pews in droves.

    Candy: Now modern society espouses a different falsehood—an oversimplify version of hedonism--what Christopher West calls “The Fast Food Diet.” (“The Starvation Diet” and “The Fast Food Diet” are from his book Fill These Hearts, which heavily influenced this article). But since this is a Halloween article, let's call it "the Candy Diet". The candy diet says have as much of any type of candy you want without stealing someone else's candy. Darn, that sounded dirty. Oh no wait, this an article about Eros. I guess it was supposed to.


    However, this is deeply unhealthy for the human person, as much so as if we really only ate candy.  It will kill us eventually.

    According to West, a Catholic is not to subscribe to either diet.  We are to live in the discomfort in between the two.  (This is not saying "lust and then don't do" or "lust and then do", but rather an acknowledgement that there is both richness and challenges enough in the proper use of our sexual faculty.)  Our desire for one another prefigures our desire for Christ himself, and we should thus treat it with the dignity it deserves.

    Whether we are a monk in a monastery or a married couple, we must walk the difficult balance of using our sexuality properly, neither trying to bury it or indulge it, but surrendering it to God for his use at every moment.  Misuse of sexuality blocks us from a full relationship with God. We cannot relate to God if the relational faculty God gave us is misused. But if we align our sexuality with God's will for us, then all our relationships require a peace and richness that foreshadows the banquet of heaven.  In other words, we need vegetables and protein, not candy.

    Writer's-Cramp Conclusion: 
    The Church's seeming list of "don't" is not an effort to curb self-expression or limit our freedom, any more than a hang glider limits our freedom if we were to jump of a cliff.

    The goal of theology of the body is to align us fully with our true selves as beings who love.  Human sexuality, like everything God created, is good. But also like everything God created, it can be misused.

    I don't think modern culture disagrees that it can be misused, it just disagrees the how.  Everyone wants to be the most fully good, beautiful, and true human he or she can be.  Conscious of the many sins and flaws of those in the Church (including myself), I still believe that the Catholic Church provides the most accurate road map.

    See, I barely got to Halloween at all, and I didn't explain the Church teaching other than in the most cursory way.  Let me conclude a different way then: be Morticia and Gomez, not Buffy and Spike.